A Look to Iran, Syria

- Israeli airstrike kills 2 in Northern Gaza. The Gaza relief flotilla was stopped by the Israeli blockade, but without violence.

- U.S. drone raids kill at least 127 in 2 days (Somalia, Pakistan).

- Syrian Forces Renew Shelling in Homs (at least 3 killed).
- Activists say at least 15 killed as Syria's stance on talks is tested.

Syria is a major ally of Iran. It is almost certain that an attack on one, would end up being a war with both. This is likely a strong reason for the West's attempted dismantling of Syria.

As for Iran directly, check out the articles, War with Iran has already begun, as well as another related one, U.S. to Attack Iran by Fall 2012.

Opinion: there is a lot of disinformation about Iran, and the possibilities of war with them. It is my view that if we are going to fight with Iran, sooner is far better than later!

Iran is not  an evil country for wanting nuclear capabilities. As stated before, they are surrounded by numerous other nations that have nuclear arms, some of them hostile toward Iran. Why worry about Israel? At this point, Israel has over 300 nuclear weapons, and Iran has none. Iran's uranium enrichment has only begun about a month ago, and they have every right to do so. But even when they actually, finally have a nuclear weapon, why would they attack? Look at the numbers; Iran would quickly be destroyed in a retaliatory strike! No, with their aggressive, arch-enemy Israel in the neighborhood, Iran wants these weapons for defense.

Iran has a strong, modern military; and it gets stronger all the time. Yet even so, they are well behind the U.S. in capability. If the West has determined that Iran "must go", waiting to strike them would only favor Iran. They will continue to "shore up" their defenses, and add new capabilities to their arsenal as time goes on. I cannot tell you what is in the minds of these globalists, but waiting does not seem rational to their agenda.

This assumes, of course, that we would engage Iran in a shooting war. This doesn't seem to make sense, either. The U.S. & its allies have the nuclear capability (at least) to destroy Iran, without taking numerous casualties to either manpower or equipment. Yes, a nuclear strike could well provoke China and Russia; but they know the risks of a nuclear war, and presumeably have no clear advantage within that scenario. Why would we give up our military advantage to fight the war that Iran wants? Why make a fire by rubbing sticks together, when there is a lighter at your disposal? I believe that when the attack comes, it will be a well planned strike from which Iran will have little capability left (militarily). What happens after that is a question.

Disinformation, like the supposed withdrawing of troops from Iraq, or this leaked article about a "Fall 2012" attack, are likely meant to make Iran relax its posture at a crucial time- in my opinion! But then again, if there is an election next year, it does not appear that Obama has a chance without some type of a greater war, or false-flag terror event.